I'm assuming we're talking about replacing dampers with the purpose of making the car faster round a track as opposed to giveing a more comfortable ride on the road.
Its all a bit subjective isnt it, unless you're doing back to back tests on a track with a stop watch.
Personally I've always thought that AVO's were supposed to be a bit cheap and nasty, I've never used them myself on the caterham ( I had a set on a TVR cerbera which gave no problems at all, but I never tried that car on track) though so I guess that statement can be disregarded (its just what I've read/heard).
I changed to the M1 bilsteins and spring rates as per the roadsports race cars from the standard fit M0 bilsteins, but at the same time I had a cage fitted and the car corner weighted and the geometry changed. After this the car was vastly improved in terms of handling/grip etc, but I cant attribute that to just the damper and spring change.
I figured I didnt know enough about suspension setup to warrant going for some adjustable nitrons (I'd probably make the car slower) , so I went for what should be a pretty good setup for the car on track given that its the standard for the roadsports series and I guess in this respect the freestyle solution is also tried and tested and should work reasonably well.
In summary - I havent a clue about suspension, and I dont talk from a position of any authority, so dont listen to anything I have to say about it, these are just my thoughts on the matter.
Edited to add - I guess what makes one damper better than another is accuracy of damping (ie if the manufacturor says it is x then closer the damper is to x the better it is), consistent damping through a given temperature range, weight??, rebuildability, adjustability (with accuracy), probably more factors that I dont know about.
Edited by - julians on 21 Oct 2005 11:10:19