This is not the case for pre’ 90 cars which don’t have VIN identification for the MOT tester to use. The requirements are however clear from the guide in #5 and I don’t see that Caterham can, or need to, provide anything further to support us X-flow owners. In this case the V5 says the car was new at time of registration, it has a period registration and the chassis number does not identify it as a kit build (‘K’ as first character) which may well lead an MOT tester to insist on a pre ’92 3.5% metered test. I’d have thought the key was to get confirmation from Caterham that the car was supplied as a CKD with all new parts for amateur build, or at least confirm it wasn't factory built. If kit built then the original owner will have submitted a V627/1 Build Up Vehicle Inspection Report when the vehicle was inspected for registration declaring which of the principal parts were new or otherwise. In order to have a period plate, rather than a Q, then all will have been declared new and a Certificate of Newness would (should?) have been issued by Caterham. This information should be available from the DVLA but may be difficult / long winded to get verified. If, as it seems, the engine was declared new then I’m pretty certain that the age of the engine will be considered to be the year of manufacture declared on the V627 ie. that for the car as a whole. The other thing to consider is that the engine is not as it was originally supplied which, from the chassis no, would been a 1600GT with a single 32 downdraught. If the engine was replaced then this should be seen from the V5.