Jump to content
Click here if you are having website access problems ×

Seven 160 A-frame upgrade to SuperSprint spec?


cdt123

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Has anyone fitted one of these to a 160? Looking at the manual it looks as if it bolts to the diff however having a look in mine I don’t think mine has this bracket.

https://caterhamparts.co.uk/a-frames/6956-a-frame-live-axle-seven-160-only.html

Doing some digging, it looks as if this could be the chassis upgrade that the super sprint has. Can anyone confirm if this is true? If so, potentially a worthwhile upgrade for a 160?

Cheers!

Chris. 

IMG_0581.jpeg

Edited by cdt123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
2 hours ago, cdt123 said:

Looking at the manual it looks as if it bolts to the diff however having a look in mine I don’t think mine has this bracket.

You've got the pictorial-style manual already. If you'd like the old text-rich version and the factory amendments list please send me a Private Message with your email address. 

Jonathan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiddy7 said:

That picture is from the 170 build manual, the 160 does not use an a frame it has two trailing links on each side and a panard rod

 

 

IMG_6463.jpeg

IMG_6464.jpeg

IMG_6465.jpeg

Ah interesting! Does anyone know what the SuperSprint has which supposedly has a chassis upgrade (+LSD) is? I wonder if the 160 would still benifit from an a-frame if it was possible to fit one or does the panhard rod do a sufficient job?

Also thanks @Tiddy7 for the photos!

Edited by cdt123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The panhard rod has been used in many live axle sevens (westfields, locosts etc) and as an upgrade to old skool escorts. It does the job very well, but it has a limitation. As one end is secured to the chassis it becomes a fixed rotation point and as the axle rises and falls, its mounting on the axle end moves in a slight arc. That in turn means the axle moves slightly sideways instead of purely up and down. Ideally the panhard rod should be level when the car is normally loaded to minimise the side to side deflection. 

I'm sure an experienced racer would be able to tell the subtle difference between a panhard rod or an A frame. I guess most drivers wouldn't, especially on a normal road therefore I'd say the panhard rod would do a sufficient job. nb i've got no back to back experience to quote from comparing an A frame to panhard rod.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Area Representative
4 hours ago, SLR No.77 said:

Paul, the part that Chris has linked to is definitely an A-frame for a live axle Suzuki 160, although beyond that I can't help with the question!

Stu.

Ahhh!  The only 3 pot 7 I have seen had trailing arms and a panhard rod. I didn’t realise there were already differences in them. 
As has been said the panhard rod does an adequate job. I think you’d need to be Lewis Hamilton to notice the lateral movement it gives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...