Jump to content
Click here if you are having website access problems ×

Summary of Dedion tube failures


Ian B

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 221
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Area Representative

When I built my R400D in 2012 I retained the label from the Dedion which is the wide buttress type.

The label states that it is an 09 Update with part number 82889? No idea what the 'updates' are but all the welded on components are VERY meaty, more so than my previous Year 2000 K Srs car.

So what is a 09 updated Dedion if there is such an animal?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Joseph, it depends on the age of your car (see the link in post #177 as JK suggested).

The most common failure is the front of the under-dedion tube damper mount peels away from the tube as here

It can be quite difficult to spot as it's on the front side of the dedion tube, and has the damper bolted through it, and extending upwards 'over' the crack.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, have been under the car and got some pics, the suspension mounting to the tube points all look fine no cracks, the whole tube has very very light surface rust, it looks much worse in these pics due to the flash but still concerning, can you tell from these pics what model tube it is? I felt around the front and it has the drilled wholes that mount the pipe fittings as well.


/sites/default/files/images/users/13910/IMG_1295.JPG

/sites/default/files/images/users/13910/IMG_1301.JPG

/sites/default/files/images/users/13910/IMG_1307.JPG

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Joseph,

it looks like one of the later ones, with the extra flange supporting the front of the suspension mounting boss.  The earlier ones didn't have this extra support and in extreme cases, the boss peeled away from the deDion tube.

However, I'd strongly recommend getting the tube blasted and checked as soon as is practical, as that rust/bubbling could be hiding a lot.  I can't recall ever seeing a tube as uniformly rusty as that..

ETA - it looks like an series 5 tube, here:
http://213-04.com/t.asp?id=94283

HTH - Simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be to do with the manufacture time.

When Arch made early chassis - before 2001 - the powdercoating was pretty good.
There were then a few years when the coating didn't do so well and flaked/rusted.

Your car/chassis may be one that lasted better - or may have been refinished at some time.

The deDion is definitely newer than the car, so may be from the 'dubious' era, or could have come from a completely different car.
A small concern is that your car would probably have originally had a dedion with the shock mounting through the tube instead of under it.  If that is the case and you are on your original shocks, then they may not have the travel they should have.
Alternatively, the shocks may have been changed when the deDion was.

Re: JKs comment above - the wire in the brake pad is a depth sensor.  Many pads being sold these days have the wear sensor built in, but not used in the Caterham fitment.  The wire can be cut away, where it enters the side of the pad material.

However, it it doesn't enter the pad, then it may be a wheel speed sensor.  
The pad wear wiring tends to be very short and wouldn't reach along the wishbone.  A speed sensor may be behind the caliper - it would normally be mounted so that it nearly touches the heads of the bolts on the back of the disc - it counts the bolts as they past and sends a signal to a speedometer.  There may have been a bike speedo on your car at some point.

Cheers - Simon

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The car is a 2002 K series so I would have thought the tube would be the correct age?

Regarding the wire I am going to take the wheel off and investigate at the weekend, the car has a sat tracking system fitted by previous owner, perhaps something to do with that, will see?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes same car, as far as I can tell very clean, it was built in 2002 went back to caterham for post build checks, has done 13k miles with full caterham/lotus specialist service history including a cam belt change at 10k.

3 owners last two knew each other. Now me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 6 months later...

Mine is loosing quite a bit of it's powder coating, i think I will remove it now just for piece of mind. 

I would think Caterham would have to replace a failure free of charge as this certainly comes under the sale of goods act ie not fit for purpose or of merchantable quality. I own a BMW 1200 GS and it was recalled at 10 years old to replace a rear brake disc mount and fuel tank fitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having welded one up in the car park of an Italian hotel that had a definite failure of the shock mounts (it wasn't mine), I keep a close eye on mine.

And after 17 yrs, 40,000 plus miles, mostly on some crap back roads in the UK and Europe, standard springs, sensible tyres, mine is still un-cracked, still remarkably powder-coated and still working well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...