Jump to content
Click here if you are having website access problems ×

Jim 123

Account Inactive
  • Posts

    1,042
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jim 123

  1. It would be very interesting to hear how P1 works out on your car. It appears to have a number of claimed virtues.  It is scratch polishable, and has no exposed edges to trap crud or lift; and peels off in one piece if needed.  A number of OEM's have played with opaque  single layer versions of P1 for in-transit protection, but the maths and process issues don't stack up for that type of situation even though the product has performance tested well.

    The number of layers (thus material thickness) might give a small colour shift.  Probably not noticeable on the back wings, but you could always ask for a sample to be sprayed on a piece of glass as a pre check.

    I'd guess that it needs a booth environment for application in order to avoid small dirt particles being trapped in the dying film as they won't be removable later.  Might be worth asking if they mask around the rear lights or remove them for spraying, just to avoid any surprise if you have to peel the P1 off at any time.

  2. As a precaution you may want to vernier check the thickness of your disc as you will probably end up removing the same amount off each side with the lathe.  Best not to go below minimum thickness esp if you are tack daying.

  3. Sorry maybe this can clarify my question...... If you look at the disc by standing at the side of the car, like looking at a clock face, what proportion of the "clock face" i.e. the disc is distorted and is the distortion towards the inside of the car or is it a bulge out? 

  4. Not sure if I know where I am going with this, but is the run out towards or away from the center line of the car, and over what percentage of the rotor and flange circumference do you get the run out?

  5. I went through the same decision process and plumped for the Dremmel mainly as I saw it as the most robust offering.  However as a rare to occasional user I think a cheaper option would be just as good and still last quite a few years.  I bought a kit but to be honest the party bag of different tools remains 90 % unused. 

  6. Caterham parts do a Seven specific ball joint splitter for your application, it costs about £70 however.  For kit assembly they provide a plain M14 nut to draw the ball joint into its seat and then swap for a nyloc torqued to 54Nm.

  7. For your MOT would setting the he cable to give a "tight" 3rd click be a precaution for the roller readings.  You can always back off afterwards.

    I find that the number and position of the cable to chassis retainers does influence the N / S efficiency, as some handbrake application is sacrificed due to distortion of the outer cable under tension.

  8. Mark in my experience with a kit build you will have no issue whatsoever with Caterham regarding warranty. I cannot speak more positively about them. Maybe talk to CC, as I'd suspect that at this stage with a brand new car they will want you to get a lot more miles on the clock to bed everything down.  There are dozens of components in a new car that influence driveline shunt and they need to be worked over miles to achieve their design intent. 

  9. Mark re #20 to possibly help settle you down as it's unlikely you can find another LSD to check from the IoM.

    Whilst it's not the most tech investigation, what about eliminating the upstream driveline tolerances as much as possible and measure the clunk to clunk rotation of the diff flange with the back wheels locked (handbrake).  If you have a dial gauge all the better, and Im sure some other LSD owners on this posting would give you comparative readings from their cars.

     

     

  10. In your video it is difficult to evaluate as the car is in neutral and the diff is rotating as you simulate the clunk.  Do you have any idea what travel or angle of movement you are getting in one direction when the diff flange is locked?

×
×
  • Create New...