Jump to content
Click here if you are having website access problems ×

R400 Duratec: coolant sender (for the gauge)


John Vine

Recommended Posts

My temperature gauge toggles between coolant and oil temps.  Recently, during a 30+ mile journey, I noticed that the coolant struggles to reach 70C whereas oil easily reaches 80-85C.  This has become more apparent over the last 6 months or so.

A recent Easimap log shows coolant temperature (different sender, of course) fluctuating in the 85-95C range:

Easimaplog_coolanttemp.jpg.7b11c61ee41753ab0cb0c512c055be55.jpg

So, it looks as though the thermostat is working ok but the sender for the gauge is getting tired.

This is the location of the sender at the rear of the block:

Coolanttemperaturesenderforgauge_arrowed.jpg.c7514b23e27999fbeba3497cac3b1dea.jpg

and in close-up:

Coolanttemperaturesenderforgauge_close-up.thumb.jpg.07aedfbc511742ca79ae335587898366.jpg

 

I'm assuming the sender is 71167.   But would this one be a suitable replacement (apart from the terminal)?

JV

Edited by John Vine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, OldAndrewE said:

I would think the sender needs to be matched with the gauge.  That ebay one may well be but how would you know

Indeed. 

Does anyone happen to know the temp/resistance spec of 71167?  If I could establish that, I could ask alternative suppliers what specs their senders were.  Or, I could simply buy CC's overpriced item.

JV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
3 minutes ago, John Vine said:

Indeed. 

Does anyone happen to know the temp/resistance spec of 71167?  If I could establish that, I could ask alternative suppliers what specs their senders were.  Or, I could simply buy CC's overpriced item.

1158 to 44 Ω, according to Caerbont.

Jonathan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'm puzzled now.  I've just measured the resistances of my two (supposedly identical 71167) senders.  The one for coolant reads 11.0 Kohms at 12C, whereas the one for oil reads 4.5 Kohms. 

To me, this suggests that either the senders are not identical after all, or that the coolant one will under-read at say 80C (which is what I observe).  CC Parts website says "Part has recently changed. Replacement for original part" for 71167.

Any thoughts, chaps?

JV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, John Vine said:

Well, I'm puzzled now.  I've just measured the resistances of my two (supposedly identical 71167) senders.  The one for coolant reads 11.0 Kohms at 12C, whereas the one for oil reads 4.5 Kohms. 

To me, this suggests that either the senders are not identical after all, or that the coolant one will under-read at say 80C (which is what I observe).  CC Parts website says "Part has recently changed. Replacement for original part" for 71167.

Any thoughts, chaps?

JV

Hi John, my 2012 R400 has different coolant sensors for oil and water. The oil temp sensor is a Bosch type, the coolant temp sensor is a Ford type. The calibration voltage curve in my ECU at 10C shows 3.70/5.00V for the coolant and 3.96/5.00V for the oil sensor. The Bosch NTC sensor has a nominal 3,792 ohm resistance at 10C (which is probably within measurement and manufacturing tolerance for 4,500 ohms at 12C, my sensor would be 3,808 ohms if the calibration curve is accurate). This equates with a 1000 ohm pull-up resistor in the ECU to give 3.96V across the sensor. The Ford sensor would need a resistance of 2,846 ohms to provide 3.70V across it.

Either I have a different Ford coolant sensor on my car or your sensor is somewhat high resistance. Did you measure sensor resistance directly at the sensor with the sensor wires disconnected?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, aerobod - near CYYC said:

Hi John, my 2012 R400 has different coolant sensors for oil and water. The oil temp sensor is a Bosch type, the coolant temp sensor is a Ford type. The calibration voltage curve in my ECU at 10C shows 3.70/5.00V for the coolant and 3.96/5.00V for the oil sensor. The Bosch NTC sensor has a nominal 3,792 ohm resistance at 10C (which is probably within measurement and manufacturing tolerance for 4,500 ohms at 12C, my sensor would be 3,808 ohms if the calibration curve is accurate). This equates with a 1000 ohm pull-up resistor in the ECU to give 3.96V across the sensor. The Ford sensor would need a resistance of 2,846 ohms to provide 3.70V across it.

Either I have a different Ford coolant sensor on my car or your sensor is somewhat high resistance. Did you measure sensor resistance directly at the sensor with the sensor wires disconnected?

Thanks for that info, James. 

My oil temp sensor is CC p/n 71167, fitted in the finger-filter plug of the wet sump (about three years ago):

Protectionforoiltempsensorandlead.thumb.JPG.54c356b0fae12b129d4325dddc3c30c8.JPG

CC Parts advised at the time that it was the same as the existing coolant sensor.

My coolant temp sensor is whatever was fitted to the engine when the kit was delivered in 2008.   I'm assuming from CC's advice that it is also p/n 71167, but I note that CC Parts sold a "replacement" part at some point (which could well have slightly different characteristics).

Yes, I detached the coolant sender lead then measured resistance between sensor terminal and engine housing.  I also measured both coolant and oil sensor resistances via the connectors on my dash toggle switch (after disconnecting them).  The coolant sensor value was the same.

Anyway, I've just ordered a Smith's TT6811-03 sensor from Demon Tweeks which, according to Jonathan's Caerbont link upthread, is a 71167.  

JV

Edited by John Vine
Fix typo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked Caerbont if they could provide temp/resistance data for the TT6811-03 sensor (believed to be the same as CC's 71167).  This is what they kindly sent me:

TT6811-03temp-resistancetable.jpg.dee352deadd47965bbc47356e0a2b160.jpg

In chart form:

TT6811-03temp-resistancechart.jpg.14c3c898c450383df92ad280d47c0c9e.jpg

The Caerbont engineer said there was no calibration data below 40C ("literally could be anything", he said), so I'm unable to make any sense of my 12C readings.

JV

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Vine said:

I asked Caerbont if they could provide temp/resistance data for the TT6811-03 sensor (believed to be the same as CC's 71167).  This is what they kindly sent me:

TT6811-03temp-resistancetable.jpg.dee352deadd47965bbc47356e0a2b160.jpg

In chart form:

TT6811-03temp-resistancechart.jpg.14c3c898c450383df92ad280d47c0c9e.jpg

The Caerbont engineer said there was no calibration data below 40C ("literally could be anything", he said), so I'm unable to make any sense of my 12C readings.

JV

 

Hi John,

The characteristics of the thermistors used are similar across all the manufacturers, although the exact calibration will vary. The Bosch curve is similar with about a 1.5 scaling factor at higher temps compared with the Caerbont curve, but similar resistance at 40C - https://www.bosch-motorsport.com/content/downloads/Raceparts/en-GB/53687307119081483.html#/Tabs=53698955/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, aerobod - near CYYC said:

Hi John,

The characteristics of the thermistors used are similar across all the manufacturers, although the exact calibration will vary. The Bosch curve is similar with about a 1.5 scaling factor at higher temps compared with the Caerbont curve, but similar resistance at 40C - https://www.bosch-motorsport.com/content/downloads/Raceparts/en-GB/53687307119081483.html#/Tabs=53698955/

Thanks, James -- very interesting.  It looks as though my 4.5Kohms at 12C could be feasible.  I'll measure my new sensor when it arrives, and report back.

JV

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

An update...

Demon-Tweeks let me down, I'm afraid.  Although the sender was shown as in stock when I ordered it, nothing arrived.  When I queried this, DT regretted that it was now out of stock.  Annoying, as I wanted to fit it prior to my imminent trip to France.  I approached Caerbont, who said they could supply the sender.  They sent me a pro forma invoice, but specified a delivery time of a week (so, too late for me).   I then asked the ever reliable Chris at Redline.  Yes, he had the correct part (TT6811-03 = 71167).  I ordered it yesterday (pm) and it arrived in this morning's post (Saturday).  What a service!

I measured the resistance to be 3290 ohms at 17C, so it looks as though that's going to fix my problem.  I'll be fitting it tomorrow, along with a bleed tee.

For info, the curve looks like this (estimated values below 40C, apart from 17C):

Temp-resistanceplotforTT6811-0371167sender.jpg.0225c197c3b64cf5081a9b3123cdae62.jpg

JV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jonathan Kay said:

But I'm not sure which of those points are your measurements and which are from somewhere else...

Points from 40C upwards are from Caerbont.  Points below 40C (apart from the 17C one, which I measured myself at 3290 ohms) are my estimates while attempting to force a smooth graph.  I couldn't find a way in Excel to differentiate them!

JV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I fitted the new sender this morning, along with a bleed tee.

The new sender has definitely fixed the original problem, although the gauge still under-reads by about 3C, compared to the coolant temperature as reported by Easimap:

New71167sendergaugecoolanttemp_20240414.thumb.jpg.7049506e1d33d7de5b2bff3ee5692f76.jpg

New71167senderECUcoolanttemp_20240414.thumb.jpg.9e174af33b3a17c608f804d416c19413.jpg


But I can live with that.

JV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...