BBL Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 My guess is that this is primarily due to the .club domain suffix. Maybe it would be possible to re-allocate the old 214-03.com (I think that was it?) domain as an alternate for the new forum/site, like it was with BC way back when... last week? http://www.lotus7.club/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.png edit -- I'll read any replies approximately 24 hours from now, as you lot are all probably asleep now, and I'll be sleeping and then working during your day and evening. http://www.lotus7.club/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/sad_smile.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myles Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 I'd love 213-04.com to be re-tasked too. My current employer blocked even that site eventually (damned content-monitors!) but I used it universally on all of my devices and cursed whenever someone linked to a BlatChat 'version' of a thread as I never cached my credentials on that version of the site... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBL Posted October 7, 2014 Author Share Posted October 7, 2014 It wouldn't have to be 213-04.com for the alternate address. It could be BCindustries.com, or 7analytics.com, or arnie-vs-norman.com, or whatever made up name that didn't immediately throw up red flags. Probably good to be a .com though, as that is least likely to set off the flags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Area Representative Golf Juliet Tango Posted October 7, 2014 Area Representative Share Posted October 7, 2014 This is certainly on the list of things which need to be/should have been addressed. I will make sure that it is talked about at the mamangement team meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBL Posted October 8, 2014 Author Share Posted October 8, 2014 Thank you, Mr. Tango! http://www.lotus7.club/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/teeth_smile.pngIt was seeming to me as though maybe I was the only one who thought this would be desirable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy bell Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 depends how they do the filtering if its by URL or by content type as it could be with move to new systems its trapping what the system is. It may work for some but not for others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Area Representative Golf Juliet Tango Posted October 8, 2014 Area Representative Share Posted October 8, 2014 It's a pleasure Sean. It was on my list of bugs/defects/missing functionality from day 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now