David aka Blue7

No problems with mine

Where can we find / access Simon Lambert's written response, I haven't heard any mention of that before now? Bob and Simon both looked a bit "edgy" when answering the question, it would have been nice to hear some factual information like how many CSRs built, how many owners responded to the survey and how many reported faults, results of material analysis and stress testing etc. instead of "the problem being not as bad as social media suggested", in which case why go to the expense of redesigning the part or the whole of the rear suspension? I would have liked to hear some facts but I suppose the subject will be swept under the carpet until there is a fatality and all this evidence will have some relevance.

The webinar takes place on 22 February, some of us have proposed questions but there is no guarantee that they will be asked.

I agree, I never lock mine ... and I never lock my doors either

Good point, maybe that's why they are all "not in stock" but they must be fitting some version to the 485 and why are CC suggesting replacement, if damaged, and yet not listing a suitable replacement? Such issues could be clarified by posing the question to CC

I have registered for the webinar and proposed two questions, one relating to progress to date, conclusions as to cause of failure and have the brackets fitted to the present Seven 485 CSR been modified or improved in any way. My second question is why are the clevis brackets not being listed individually in the online store, they are currently only listed as just one component part of the whole upright assembly kits costing between £1293 and £1631 for one side only, to replace both sides would be double that price and to buy all those un-required component parts is not really "green" like (as was said in comparison of Rorkes Drift to Bala in the film Zulu). Given the importance of replacement, why are they all listed as “not currently in stock”. Failure of these brackets could have possible life threatening consequences so if the questions aren't put to CC a quote from Hamlet comes to mind including the words rotten and Denmark.

Excellent suggestion , I haven't registered yet but will do so tomorrow

I'm surprised that you still have all the pieces especially that small section of the lug, were they all still attached to the bolt? Do you intend to hand them to CC? I am intrigued as to what CC are doing because I would have thought that any metallurgical tests would have been completed by now, along with conclusions regarding cause? Maybe John Chilcot is in charge of investigations so we can expect publication of results in 7 years time, an appropriate period I suppose.

You might want to take a look at this discussion I fitted a JWM Jack Webb lithium battery and you can read my comments on the above link. I had to drill out the tray and fit a new tray. The basic difference is that with the immobiliser drain, the Banner lasted 4 weeks before discharge whereas the JWM lithium lasts just 2 weeks, if that. The JWM also has the added complication of a Low Voltage Protector (LVP), which activates when it senses low voltage and shuts the battery down to prevent complete discharge and permanent damage. You need a special CTEK charger that will override that LVP and allow the battery to charge, a normal charger thinks the battery is completely dead and will not charge it. On some occasions even the CTEK will not charge it unless I disconnect the battery terminals. My former Banners lasted 4-5 years and in hindsight I would have stuck with Banner, I don't see any advantage of a lithium battery other than a definite advantage in weight reduction, the lithium is a featherweight compared to the Banner and definitely fulfils the Just Add Lightness ethic. I would say you made the right decision to stick with Banner

Good neat job, I think you would get a start with CC if ever you are looking for a job 😁 I don't want to spoil your new year but have you seen the announcement in What Car magazine that Avon have announced that in 2024 their ZZS 195/50 R15 82W tyres will be replaced by ZZS 195/55, which means you will need to get your dremel out again when you replace your present tyres? Don't worry ... just joking ... have a Good 2024!

£3,480 !!!!!!! I was just about to turn my last radiator off and all the lights in the hope that I may be able to afford one, when I suddenly spotted that familiar red notice, oh well, I'll just have to continue to ask a Policeman, if I can find one. 😕

Is anyone taking bets that it will be longer than the Covid Enquiry? A logical person would assume that by now all CSR owners that are aware of the problem will have replaced their clevis brackets for peace of mind and if nothing else for the safety of their passengers, other road users and pedestrians ... but ... I know of at least two that just take the attitude of "hey ho" I'll just have them checked at each service. In any case, the cause of the problem is quite obvious, "climate change", only a doubter would disagree.

New customer update today, nothing new other than investigations still ongoing, not even a Merry Christmas Meantime check your stockings ... you never know what Santa may bring

You're most welcome, please post some pics when you have finished

Yes I agree, it is a bonus that you have the wings off and elongating the holes as shown in red below, would allow you to heighten the wings, also required where the indicator fits on the other side. Maybe a spacer of some kind, flat or maybe tubular to slide over the stay or just use more glue. The bigheads I used are 30mm square and the loops are about 8mm high, the ones in the link above seem to be slightly larger at 38mm square. I won't, if ever, have to face that problem, I cheated and bought 4 x front CR500's which should see me out! Just found my original post here