My apologies if you thought my response to be rude, it certainly wasn't my intention. I was just trying to make my question clear. I was simply asking how the algorithm within the ECU functions, which was the reason behind my "contrived" scenario. Your response however does answer my question, but also highlights the flaw in alpha-n mapping at low Rev and throttle openings due to the large change in air flow against a tiny change in the throttle pot. How we can map around this using throttle enrichment transients and closely packed load sites is an interesting one. This is why I questioned using a 'hybrid' strategy which uses the MAP signal below a set threshold and the TPS above it. Since the map signal responds with high resolution at low throttle openings it's advantageous to use it and since map signal has low resolution above 90kpa it is advantageous to then switch to TPS. In your previous post you mentioned that this caused problems on the VHPD engine, and I am keen to understand why that's all. You mentioned about how the engine actually runs on alpha-n, and my own limited experience has seen that on a car with throttle bodies, and cams is that there is a lean off at tip in which means the engine stalls. This means that I have to then drive around the problem. I suspect many people on the forum may have a similar issue, and I thought a sensible debate about alternative solutions would be healthy.