Peter Carmichael Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 Edited by - Peter Carmichael on 23 Jul 2007 11:41:59 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Setok Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 Peter, as I said, I'm not quite sure what the terms are in English (and I only vaguely remember them in Finnish). Your equation is fine, but surely you are going to need more stopping power to stop dead something with more kinetic energy/force/whatever (locking wheels), in other words to counter the forward moving vector. Like, a wooden fence would probably stop a car rolling along at 5 km/h while it won't do it if you're going along at 100km/h. We're talking about locking the wheels here and optimal braking. After they are locked then additional braking power isn't going to help, but my claim is that bigger brakes are needed to reach that point at higher speeds. Braking feel and everything else is obviously important as well, but that's not really what I'm talking about. --- Kristoffer Lawson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron_F Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 Not sure if I want to re-open this debate but I do have another "silly question" about my big brakes During a recent MOT, both myself and the tester noticed that the off-side front brake locked up much earlier that the near side front, i.e the osf brake gave less braking than the nsf brake. The car was well within the permitted limits (so it passed) but neither of us could understand why one side gave significantly less braking than the other. When the brake balance was tested, both rollers going, the dials progressed at an equal pace, but it was always the osf that locked first. When tested individually, the nsf gave about 1.5 times the braking force of the osf. The car is an SV140 with the uprated Caterham big brakes, 7800 miles since new, still plenty of pads I had previously noted that the osf tyre was always the first to lock when pressing on, I put this down to uneven weight distribution. On the Brake test rollers, both wheels would have the same mechanical grip, so what would cause the osf to lock first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6speedmanual Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 Ron Weight distribution also at work on MOT brake rollers. If you had previously noticed osf locking up before nsf, the MOT measuring equipment is confirming this. As it happens in a static condition on the rollers, I suspect a mechanical issue, rather than driving style eg: braking into turns. More likely to be uneven braking effort rather than chassis set-up (because weight will be more on osf due to driver). Possible causes include: One or more lazy/seized pistons in one of the calipers Glazed pads/discs on one side Blocked hydraulic pipe etc Peter 6SpeedManual *tongue*There's no such thing as too much BHP per Ton 😬 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iguana Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 As above, need to investigate that, would expect nsf to lock up 1st, always did when solo in my old track car & on road rubber, balance was fine & calipers were new. Just had similar on my old bmw tintop, but worse so MOT fail on balance, so yesterday took caliper off & apart, piston had rust on it, seal was caught & not allowing full movement, popped piston out carefully cleaned it & de rusted, the seals were fine popped it back in & all seems good, hurrah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Wong1697456877 Posted June 23, 2008 Share Posted June 23, 2008 No science. Subjectively, the big brakes are much better at stopping the first time and repeatedly. Subjectively, it feels like the control up to the point of locking up is much better with the big brakes. Again no science, but if you turn in hard and just yank the wheel to one side, the tyres will loose grip well before you generate 1 g lateral force. If you gently feed the wheel, you'll generate up to about 1g before the tyres give. It feels like the same thing. The way the braking force is applied allows you to get much higher slowing forces, and in a much more controllable manner with the bigger brakes. ----- VDU 7X Pics More VDU 7X Pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron_F Posted June 23, 2008 Share Posted June 23, 2008 Guys, Thanks for your feedback, maybe I'm a bit thick 😳 but how/why would reduced braking effort cause the osf to lock up earlier? Surely, if the braking effort was reduced as a result of a mechanical problem (sticking piston etc), then the osf brake would not be able to lock the wheel at all. Currently it locks it than sooner than the nsf. Is this a case where the application of common sense doesn't work Ron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6speedmanual Posted June 23, 2008 Share Posted June 23, 2008 Hi Ron "Uneven" braking effort, not necessarily excessive effort on osf. The nsf could be suffering one of the aforementioned issues. When one of the front wheels is giving less, the tendency is to press pedal harder to try to acheive the expected vehicle retardation and lock up point of the working brake/wheel is arrived at very quickly. Peter 6SpeedManual *tongue*There's no such thing as too much BHP per Ton 😬 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now