Calling all Crossflow owners I took my 1996 1600 Crossflow GT Sprint for its MOT today (if Nick Chan reads this I hope he is sitting down) and after the emissions test got into a discussion with the MOT Inspector about the age of the engine. I was prepared for some questions as in previous years the definition of a kit car cropped up but wasn't expecting this. I purchased it as a CKD kit with all new parts although obviously the engine wasn't built in 1996. I thought I'd need to refer to the visual smoke test but instead the car was subject to the full sensor up the exhaust check which, as one would expect, it failed. It was then that the age of the engine cropped up and I was advised that if possible, for subsequent tests, it would be useful to have something that indicates the age of the engine. Presumably this would expedite the use of the visual test. It did pass but I am curious if anyone else has experienced this and if so what they did. I have no issues with this particular testing station, it was recommended to me by a qualified motor engineer and former MOT Inspector and I have used them for over 20 years. Many thanks Neil