Ngh30 Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 Is there a technical reason why there is a piece of wood in the boot floor ? Why wasn't it aluminium ?
Jonathan Kay Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 What do you see as the advantages of aluminium? If the piece doesn't have to be a special shape then plywood will be about the same mass and cheaper.Jonathan
DJ. Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 Solid alloy sheet of similar weight will be less rigid unless it is honeycomb which would be much more expensive. By the way, it's worth putting some varnish (or I used danish oil) on the plywood
Ngh30 Posted September 2, 2017 Author Posted September 2, 2017 It's just a question really whilst I was tinkering / cleaning today , half the boot has ally and half wood !
jimh Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 I thought it was so that we had something in common with Morgan owners?
Ngh30 Posted September 2, 2017 Author Posted September 2, 2017 I bought the Caterham as I'm fed up with doing D.I.Y on the house ( loft conversion was my last job ) I now find myself working with wood again !! lol
Wrightpayne Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 I'm sure I read it was crumple zone.Ian
Ngh30 Posted September 2, 2017 Author Posted September 2, 2017 That makes sense , thought there would be a techy reason for it !
JNC Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 Perhaps it is less of a Guillotine to your back in impact from the rear ?
vertew Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 I took the boot floor out of my 2006 CSR a while back to check the fuel pump connections and the floor material is alu / honeycomb sandwich. Perhaps used for other S3 / S5 cars around this era too?
Carrotland AR Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 I built a live axle crossflow in 1996. The wooden panel was standard but I remember fitting an ally honeycomb panel during the build because I preferred it. I think the honeycomb panel was for the race cars? It fitted without alteration at the time. Maybe reduces fire risk?
Tazio Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 The honeycomb was part of a kit, which originally included a piece to fit across the end panel and was for crash protection.
Area Representative Geoff Brown Posted September 5, 2017 Area Representative Posted September 5, 2017 I met Jez Coates at Dartford in the early 1990s to discuss certain issues with my Seven. In general conversation I questioned the plywood as part of the boot floor. He in reply stated that it was part of the crash protection structure !Think what you like & of course he may have been joking but when you look at it in the round he may have also been telling the truth..........That piece of plywood has always been there probably for good reason, just not cost cutting.
ScottR400D Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 I find it hard to believe it could make a significant contribution in an impact. It's not really a progressive energy absorbing structure, especially how it's oriented, and it's held in place by a handful of self rappers IIRC.
OliverSedlacek Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 I would have thought it dates back to the earliest Sevens, which never had anything as Hi-tech as aluminium honeycomb. It's certainly cheap and effective. I think the honeycomb was first offered to comply with race regs that called for a fireproof separator between drivers and fuel tank.
Tony P Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 I think there was a sheet aluminium boot floor option before the honeycomb board, which made it a bit easier to seal the boot from the tank area. When the honeycomb floor was made available (along with the kit for the tank), the usual procedure seemed to be to keep the plain ali panel for the front part - or the plywood piece if you weren't racing, only lightly fixed down (if at all) - in order to have something more 'deformable' if you got smacked from behind, a bit of space before the honeycomb punched into the bulkhead, but still reduce the chances of the tank being crushed and split. I think that was the theory at least...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now