Jump to content
Click here if you are having website access problems ×

Final Post on k series foam sump baffle


craigyb

Recommended Posts

I've had my car for 5 years now (1.6K supersport), and will selling the car next week. New R400, with RTB upgrade, on order to arrive in April.

I also posted  approx 3 years ago that I would be sticking with the foam baffle, and replacing it as appropriate.

So for information:

5 Years, approx 15k miles, 10 trackdays

Replaced it twice. No problems of any kind.

I had incredibly negative comments last time I posted on this, and have not posted since on blatchat, howvever, I felt now is the time to close the loop. I hope the negativity isn't repeated - I'm simply giving information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stripped my engine down for a rebuild recently. Discovered that it had the foam installed when I thought it did not, so it had been there for some time. To be honest it was absolutely fine, no sign of it being brittle and no sign of debris coming off it. I have opted to remove it after all the horror stories I've heard but they do seem to be quite variable - like yours, mine never gave any trouble. Whether we have just been lucky or not I guess we will never really know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost all K-series racers use it, never heard of any of them having a problem. Don't know if that's down to changing them and/or the oil more regularly or what. Much as I wouldn't dare to disagree with OilyHands on the topic, all the other engine builders I've spoken to recommend keeping the foam.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think my sample size is probably a lot larger than most. I have seen around 30 instances where the foam has broken up and partly clogged (and in one case completely clogged) the oil pickup. One owner had his engine serviced less than 50 miles before and they claimed to have changed the foam, it was like crispy sea weed. You measure the overall efficacy of a system by the number of times it fails rather than by individual instances of success, I can't afford to take the risk that a carefully built engine will fail due to a broken up foam insert whose purpose is at best unclear,

Oily

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm one of Oily's 30. My foam went from new to a puddle of goo (blocking/impeding the pickup with fragments in the meantime) in around 70 miles (that was the point at which I saw the oil pressure waver).

Hateful thing. Cost me a small fortune. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odd though isn't it that some last for years and some fail in as little as 70 miles ...

Does anyone have any information as to why there may be such a wide variation?

  • Have there been different materials used for the foam over the years?
  • Could it be anything to do with oil types?
  • Is it related to track use (I'm thinking oil temperature)?
  • Is there any link to HGF (I'm thinking coolant damage)?
  • Is there anything else in common between the engines where it fails which sets them apart from those that don't?

I'm not arguing with anyone, just intrigued as to why this happens so unpredicatably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never had a problem with mine, although it does get changed every year.  When I bought my Seven it still had the original baffle which was 5 years old, and it was perfectly fine.

Maybe it has something to do with the oil used.  I tend to use the Caterham stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our SV is on its second engine, the first having suffered oil starvation due to foam disintegration with the previous owner - being "not me" I have no idea how old that foam was of course, so possibly due to insufficient maintenance.

At last year's service the foam was at the "crispy seaweed" stage with some parts starting to become detached, so after some discussion I opted to dispose of it.

I've heard reasons for keeping it, relating to oil surge, but these seem mostly based in track use which we just don't do, so on balance removing it seemed safer.

It does seem, as 21jigsaw says, that there's possibly more in play than just the foam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charles - yes, I was using cheap zero-synthetic-content oil for running in and probably ingesting some coolant through a dodgy inlet gasket.

Although this is probably on the fringes of the bell-curve of most users situations, it should be noted that it took only 70 miles (and, therefore, just 90-120 minutes?) of use to get there. I wasn't running aviation fuel, nitrous or anything else out of the norm - I was just running in an engine with an undetected teething problem that anyone could pick up out on the road.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The initial development of the k series into Caterham required a north / south installation as opposed  to the east west. The other major issue was the height of the engine the bonnet line had to remain undisturbed . The installation was  12deg as per Rover installation. This in turn effected the design of the sump. The standard sump not being an option.

During the development phase engine failures occurred, examination revealed valve failure due to  oil airation. The baffle was modified and foam added to reduce the suspension of air in the oil. ( the air  is purged from the oil when the airated oil contacts an object). This resolved the issue.

It appears the cause of failure of the foam can be down to :-

 A) Foam  - original quality , specification, age, contamination, batches, shelf life, stock rotation, supplier.

B) Degradation due to oil, coolant, fuel.

C) Working inviroment.

My moneys on A.

The foam fitted to my car was from 1996 .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

LE0 is a 2003 1.8k SV with a totally unmodified engine now on 122,000 miles.  I have changed the oil (Syner-Z) and filter every 6,000 miles and the foam every 12,000.  For roughly half the mileage the engine has been run with the foam and apart from the colour there has been little difference between the old and the new.  For the other 60k it has been run without after one lot of foam started to break up and the only change I have noticed is that the oil seems to warm up more quickly, based on readings of the idling oil pressure.

So I'm squarely on the fence with a foot in both camps!


 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Just had the diagnosis from my big end failure at Snetterton. And, would you believe it, the foam had broken up and blocked the oil ways.

That foam was replaced at the start of the season. Since them it's done the pre-season trackday, testing, one qualifying and two races at Silverstone, plus testing at Snett.

Now I had a head gasket failure at Silverstone (replaced in an incredible 15 minutes by Rockey Racing to get me out into qualifying) so it's possible that coolant got into the oil.  Given that Myles also had an issue with coolant, that looks like we might have a possible culprit.

Clearly my post above was asking for trouble. Funnily enough I was regretting saying "racing K-series engines never seem to blow head gaskets" at Silverstone as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing that it happens so fast. Does anyone have a spare bit of foam and some oil and coolant to play with on the bench? For ref I'm one of those that changed my foam every big oil change (so alternate years) and never saw any degradation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OAT is an acronym for Organic Acid (Additive) Technology which describes the type of materials responsible for the corrosion protection offered by a coolant of this type. OATs are Long Life Coolants (LLC), based on minimally depleting Carboxylate Technology. This technology provides superior protection to all components of the cooling system including those exotic materials like aluminum and magnesium found in the modern day engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The foam failures  have not been consistent, hence there must be a  trend that will lead to the cause of failure providing enough accurate information is available.

 lets look at the variables prior to failure

age of foam -when purchased, when fitted,

Failure of foam -

age year , mileage.
time period in engine.
oil grade type and brand used.
coolant type and brand used.
did coolant require top up during this period that the foam was fitted.
cooling related  failures / issues during this period .
any major engine issues work carried out prior to foam failure.
Type of running race / track days , general road.

Have I missed anything out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marcus, No swelling / shrinking will leave to soak for a few more days.

John, Good point updated list.

Suggested  survey.

 

Only cars with foam fitted or suffered foam failure
engine size 
approx bhp
have you suffered overheating issues / airlock etc. Y/N
appollo / laminova fitted Y/N
wet sump only Y/N
Type of running :-
gerenal road
trackday
racing
The following questions are for Foam failure only
approx age  of foam in months
year of foam failure
approx milage before failure
oil grade type and brand used.
coolant type and brand used.
did coolant require top up during this period that the foam was fitted.
cooling related  failures / issues during this period . Y/N
any major engine issues / work carried out prior to foam failure. Y/N

I have I missed anything?

Be grateful on any suggestions / help on how to gather this information

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...